So this month we’ve seen quite a few things happening, what with Greece possibly opting out of the Eurozone, the first succesful commercial space launch (no, really, it was!), the catching of an escaped penguin (that one was the highlight of the newsreel, apparently) and Apple CEO 
If you use Twitter on a daily basis, which is still at a nascent stage when it comes to Polish users, you probably sometimes wonder what happens to the most popular tweets. Do they vanish after a period of time or are they recorded somewhere? Twitris provides an answer to the question.
It is safe to say that Twitris is a tweet-based Semantic Social Web Application that was created by the Kno.e.sis Center in Dayton, Ohio, to help in processing a huge amount of information that pop up about a particular event. The application uses Semantic web technologies that analyze and provide trustworthy data from various sources around the Internet (blogs, microblogs, news, Wikipedia articles, to name a few). It collects and archives topics, hashtags, images and videos and therefore acts like a time capsule (data is not deleted, so searches are available for future research).
Twitris’ main purpose is based on the quickest and simplest understanding of the important events that take place in the world and their influence on social perceptions. In other words, it analyzes people’s reactions to a specific piece of news or a happening. Becasue it is „event centric”, Twitris supply only utmost details on what users are discussing, when and where. The application keeps us informed on the latest news along with a semantic investigation of the whole story.
So far, the most spectacular success is the Occupy Wall Street movement analysis. The application has processed and stored around 4 million tweets from users that participated in the Occupy events. Overall, Twitris has collected all kinds of data from about 40 worldwide events, including the Iran Election in 2009 and the tragic earthquake on Haiti in 2010.
According to the app developers, there is a plan to upgrade the system with more search options and to „individuazlie” it for an ordinary user. For now, the creators choose what to follow and the latest even that is being analyzied on a large scale in the US Presidential Election, 2012.
For more relevant info, I recommend visiting the following websites:
Twitris – Official Twitris Website
By Rafał Zieliński
VOCABULARY
at a nascent stage – beginning to exist
vanish – to disappear suddenly
amount – a quantity of sth
pop up – appear suddenly or unexpectedly
trustworthy – that you can rely on to be good, honest
influence – the effect that somebody or something has on the way a person thinks or behaves
perception(s) – the way you notice things
spectacular – very impressive
worldwide – affecting all parts of the world
upgrade – to make a computer system more powerful and efficient
individualize – make something different to suit the needs of a particular person
on a large scale – involving many people or things
Take cover! The titans of the Web are about to clash. Facebook is now facing its biggest threat to date, with Google going full steam ahead at them with their new weapon of mass destruction, Google+.
Google doesn’t have a good history when it comes to social networking with both Google Wave and Google Buzz failing to catch on. The company, however quickly learns on its past mistakes and just by looking at Google+ one can notice that the they must have invested a lot of time and money in making their latest venture a potential Facebook killer. With Goggle’s enormous advertising potential and hip attitude, many people I know have followed the new trend and set this graphic as their Facebook profile picture:
The media hype around the fight seems to be getting louder by the day and many fan projects deepen the animosity between the two Internet giants even more. For example, my favourite Like vs. Plus website.
In terms of fan migration, it is hard to say what exactly makes people abandon their Facebook accounts. What’s obvious is the snowball-like effect it will cause. Migrating users will drag their friends with them and businesses will peg along. Of course, businesses which have already moved will start attracting their competitors (one has to stay innovative, after all) closing the vicious circle and increasing the momentum of the whole process.
At this point, there is one thing I can say for certain: for a social networking website, migration trend is a matter of life and death. Facebook is bound to do anything in their power to prevent their users from switching to Google+. The reason why the two can’t co-exist is simply that using two separate social networking websites with the same core functionalities would simply be impractical, form an everyday user’s perspective.
With the same basic principles behind „liking” and „+1ing”, „groups” and „circles”, and „posting on the wall” and „sharing in circles”, there’s little battleground space left for Facebook and Google+. This can only mean that all those small things and small prints will matter more than ever.
image source: benchmark.pl
One good example of this is both parties’ terms and conditions and privacy policies.
User data is the new Internet gold. People feed their private information into Facebook for free, generally unaware that their „likes” and „interests” from their profile pages are used by advertisers for targeting their campaigns.
According to wired.com, one of the Facebook’s clearest weaknesses are its 6000-word-long privacy practices, which have come under attack many times for being confusing, ever-mutating and self-serving. Facebook’s privacy controls remain difficult to navigate, despite efforts at simplification. For instance: Try to find the button to turn off having your “Likes” included in ads.
So what’s different about Google+’s privacy policy?
For one, it’s much shorter — just a sentence or two past 1,000 words. That, however, can be a little deceiving because Facebook’s policy covers all of its services, while Google+’s version has links to its other privacy policies, including ones for Google generally and the +1 button specifically (source: wired.com).
This, however, leaves a lot of room for misunderstandings and misinterpretation. Google has long emphasised that it won’t use their users’ search history to create targeted ads, but with such lax T&Cs, it’s hard to believe we have more than their word for that. After all, it’s your private data including your hobbies, interests and search history they are after. Just have a quick look at the 2009 breakdown of Facebook’s estimated revenue:
(Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/breaking-down-facebooks-revenues-2009-7#ixzz1TgZ6TZdM)
BZ
VOCABULARY:
